Comparison of Mean Stress Correction Methods for Fatigue Life Prediction

Paper #:
  • 2000-01-0778

Published:
  • 2000-03-06
Citation:
Chu, C., "Comparison of Mean Stress Correction Methods for Fatigue Life Prediction," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0778, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-0778.
Author(s):
Affiliated:
Pages:
8
Abstract:
In design for durability, it is generally believed that a compressive mean stress is beneficial and a tensile mean stress is detrimental. Quantitatively the effect of mean stress on fatigue life however is still inconclusive and may very well depend on both the material used and the loading conditions. Over the years, many models have been proposed to help predict mean stress effects. For example, in the long life region, Goodman's formula is widely used, while the Smith-Watson-Topper damage parameter seems the most popular for use in computerized local strain based fatigue tools. In this paper, several frequently cited mean stress correction methods together with the most recent crack closure based method are compared in various ways. Particular emphasis is given to the effect of yield level mean stresses, which has been traditionally neglected but is of practical importance to the ground vehicle industry.
Access
Now
SAE MOBILUS Subscriber? You may already have access.
Buy
Select
Price
List
Download
$27.00
Mail
$27.00
Members save up to 40% off list price.
Share
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL

Related Items

Article
2017-01-11
Training / Education
2013-04-09
Training / Education
2016-03-10
Training / Education
2013-04-09