Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Intake Port Geometry

Paper #:
  • 2012-01-0905

Published:
  • 2012-04-16
DOI:
  • 10.4271/2012-01-0905
Citation:
de Villiers, E. and Othmer, C., "Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Intake Port Geometry," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0905, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0905.
Pages:
12
Abstract:
Meeting the stringent efficiency demands of next generation direct injection engines requires not only optimization of the injection system and combustion chamber, but also an optimal in-cylinder swirling charge flow. This charge motion is largely determined by the shape of the intake port arm geometry and the valve position.In this paper, we outline an extensible methodology implemented in OPENFOAM® for multi-objective geometry optimization based on the continuous adjoint. The adjoint method has a large advantage over traditional optimization approaches in that its cost is not dependent upon the number of parameters being optimized. This characteristic can be used to treat every cell in the computational domain as a tunable parameter - effectively switching cells "on" or "off" depending on whether this action will help improve the objectives. Unlike CAD-based parameter optimization, the adjoint approach starts from a supplied design space and then systematically removes all elements counter-productive to the design objectives. The final design is then the fluid volume left over after all the counter-productive elements have been blocked.The adjoint system is implemented as an adjunct to a compressible steady state flow solver with the ability to maximize the swirl in a target volume while minimizing the pressure loss of the system. The tool is used to optimize the shape of the intake port arms of a combustion chamber in a static flow test configuration. A range of results were produced at different weightings of the pressure loss and swirl objectives and the ability to generate a trade-off curve between the objectives is demonstrated. At the high end, an increase in swirl of up to 250% was observed for modest increases in pressure loss, unequivocally proving the effectiveness of the new methodology.
Access
Now
SAE MOBILUS Subscriber? You may already have access.
Buy
Select
Price
List
Download
$27.00
Mail
$27.00
Members save up to 40% off list price.
Share
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL

Related Items

Training / Education
2016-03-07
Article
2016-08-24
Training / Education
2017-01-20
Article
2016-09-06
Technical Paper / Journal Article
2011-04-12