LOOP SCAVENGING versus THROUGH SCAVENGING of TWO-STROKE ENGINES

C. F. Taylor; A. R. Rogowski; A. L Hagen; J. D. Koppernaes

doi:10.4271/580044

THIS paper reports the latest investigation of the relative merits of loop scavenging versus through scavenging. The authors hope that the conditions of the work permitted an objective evaluation of the two types of engines.

The results of the study may be summarized as follows:

1.
With symmetrical timing, neither cylinder shows significant advantage in trapping efficiency.
2.
With symmetrical timing, the best ratio of exhaust-port to inlet-port effective area seems to be about 0.6.
3.
Unsymmetrical timing is an effective method of improving trapping efficiency.
4.
The value of net indicated fuel economy shows no significant difference between the two cylinders.

The authors point out that because the areas were equal it is unlikely that the optimum port design of each type was used in comparing the cylinders. If optimum porting had been used, the two types might have shown more difference.

Standards

SAE Mobilus®

Publications

News

Events

Professional Development

A World in Motion (PreK-12)

Participate with SAE

SAE Membership

Donate

LOOP SCAVENGING versus THROUGH SCAVENGING of TWO-STROKE ENGINES 580044

SAE MOBILUS