1976-02-01

Thoracic Impact Response of Live Porcine Subjects 760823

Five anesthetized porcine subjects were exposed to blunt thoracic impact using a 21 kg mass with a flat contact surface traveling at 3.0 to 12.2 m/s. The experiments were conducted to assess the appropriateness of studying in vivo mechanical and physiological response to thoracic impact in a porcine animal model.
A comprehensive review of comparative anatomy between the pig and man indicates that the cardiovascular, respiratory and thoracic skeletal systems of the pig are anatomically and functionally a good parallel of similar structures in man. Thoracic anthropometry measurements document that the chest of a 50 to 60 kg pig is similar to the 50th percentile adult male human, but is narrower and deeper. Peak applied force and chest deflection are in good agreement between the animal's responses and similar impact severity data on fresh cadavers. A thorough autopsy, performed at the completion of each test, revealed rib fracture injury patterns and thoracic organ hemorrhage levels which are similar to injuries produced in fresh cadavers. Other observations are that the living porcine model exhibits peak sternal accelerations, cardiovascular overpressures, resultant rib fractures and AIS ratings that are lower and spinal accelerations that are higher in amplitude than typical levels reported for pressurized fresh cadavers.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Injury Mechanism and Crash Kinematic of Cyclists in Accidents - An Analysis of Real Accidents

892425

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

The Safe Deceleration of Infants in Car Crashs

760816

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Analysis of Rear Seat Sled Tests with the 5th Female Hybrid III: Incorrect Conclusions in Bidez et al. SAE 2005-01-1708

2019-01-0618

View Details

X