Flight Deck Automation and Pilot Workload

Paper #:
  • 921132

Published:
  • 1992-07-01
Citation:
Kantowitz, B., "Flight Deck Automation and Pilot Workload," SAE Technical Paper 921132, 1992, https://doi.org/10.4271/921132.
Author(s):
Pages:
8
Abstract:
The highly-automated glass cockpit offers many advantages. For example, it saves fuel compared to manual flight if weather conditions are not severe. But pilots regard automation as a mixed blessing (Wiener, Chidester, Kanki, Palmer, Curry, and Gregorich, 1991). From a human factors perspective, automation is not always an innate good. While proper use of automation can improve flight safety, automation also introduces the possibility of new kinds of error that might not occur with older flight decks. As is the case with any new technology, one must also take into account how people interact with new tools. This article focusses upon some of the potential problems that can occur with glass cockpits, especially as they relate to pilot workload. The goal of the article is not to condemn automation but instead to emphasize potential problems so that they can be avoided in the future. Designers should not eschew high levels of automation. But the implementation of automation should be human-centered with due appreciation of the limitations and expectations of the pilots who are the end users of such automation.
Access
Now
SAE MOBILUS Subscriber? You may already have access.
Buy
Select
Price
List
Download
$27.00
Mail
$27.00
Members save up to 40% off list price.
Share
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL

Related Items

Standard
1994-03-01
Training / Education
2017-10-27
Technical Paper / Journal Article
2004-03-08
Training / Education
2018-04-25
Training / Education
2018-04-10
Technical Paper / Journal Article
2004-07-19
Technical Paper / Journal Article
2004-07-19