1995-02-01

Exhaust Emissions and Combustion Stability in a Bi-Fuel Spark Ignition Engine 950468

A Saturn 1.9 liter engine has been converted for operation on either compressed natural gas or gasoline. A bi-fuel controller (BFC) that uses closed-loop control methods for both fuel delivery and spark advance has been developed. The performance and emissions during operation on each fuel have been investigated with the BFC, as well as the performance and emissions with the stock original equipment manufacturer (OEM) controller using gasoline. In-cylinder pressure was measured at a rate of 1024 points per revolution with piezoelectric pressure transducers flush-mounted in the cylinder head. The in-cylinder pressure was used in real time for ignition timing control purposes, and was stored by a data acquisition system for the investigation of engine stability and differences in the combustion properties of the fuels. Engine-out emissions of hydrocarbons (HC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon dioxide (CO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) were also recorded along with other relevant engine performance data. Ignition delays, combustion durations and statistical cycle-to-cycle variations were calculated from the in-cylinder pressure traces and compared between the two fuels and different control methods. Ignition delay, defined as the time between the spark and when the in-cylinder pressure deviates significantly from a motoring curve, was shorter for CNG than for gasoline. Combustion duration, defined as the time between when 10% and 90% of the mass fraction is burned, was longer for CNG than for gasoline. Engine stability, as measured by the coefficient of variance of the gross indicated mean effective pressure [COV(IMEPg)], was better with the BFC than the stock controller. NOx emissions were found to decrease as engine stability improved. Emissions of HC, CO, and CO2 were less dependent on engine stability than they were on other parameters such as fuel type and equivalence ratio. It is the goal of this research to produce an optimized bi-fuel engine and add to the body of knowledge on the differences in combustion between CNG and gasoline.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

A Comparative Study of Performance and Emission Characteristics of CNG and Gasoline on a Single Cylinder S. I. Engine

2004-28-0038

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Experimental Test of a New Compressed Natural Gas Engine with Direct Injection

2009-01-1967

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Exhaust Emission Abatement by Fuel Variations to Produce Lean Combustion

680769

View Details

X