Accuracy in Computational Aerodynamics Part 1: Stagnation Pressure

Paper #:
  • 980037

Published:
  • 1998-02-23
Citation:
Axelsson, N., Ramnefors, M., and Gustafsson, R., "Accuracy in Computational Aerodynamics Part 1: Stagnation Pressure," SAE Technical Paper 980037, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/980037.
Pages:
13
Abstract:
For the computation of the flow around a car there is typically an overprediction of stagnation and base pressure coefficient by 0.02 and 0.07 respectively causing an underprediction of total drag by about 0.01 - 0.02.To determine the cause of the error in stagnation pressure several different effects have been investigated: length of inlet section, boundary conditions on the floor, mesh resolution, turbulence models and different flow solvers.One major effect was found to be a short inlet section in the computational model, which caused an overprediction of the stagnation pressure.The second major effect was insufficient resolution of the mesh along the stagnation line. More than 100 nodes along the stagnation line were necessary to avoid a significant pressure drop.Finally the k-ε turbulence model caused overprediction of total pressure very close to the stagnation point. The use of an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model removed this error. This turbulence model also improved prediction of pressure development along the front, in the spoiler region and at the front of the hood.
Access
Now
SAE MOBILUS Subscriber? You may already have access.
Buy
Select
Price
List
Download
$27.00
Mail
$27.00
Members save up to 40% off list price.
Share
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL

Related Items

Article
2017-03-13
Book
2002-04-15
Training / Education
2018-02-05
Training / Education
2017-06-15
Technical Paper / Journal Article
2010-10-25
Training / Education
2018-07-16