1980-02-01

A Comparison of Laboratory and Highway Tire Rolling Resistance Tests 800089

Rolling resistance measurements on the 1.7m roadwheel and Clayton twin roll simulator, and outdoor fuel consumption and coastdown tests were compared for tires specially formulated to illustrate differences. Twin roll results correlated poorly with the other tests, especially for grouped radial and bias tires. Thermal analysis showed that the twin roll test accentuates the tread region more than the 1.7m test. Equations including tire type, tread hysteresis and sidewall hysteresis correlate twin roll results well with the other tests. Twin roll rolling resistance specifications may not result in minimum fuel consumption if these factors are not considered.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
TECHNICAL PAPER

Effect of Tire Rolling Loss on Fuel Consumption of Trucks

821267

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

LCA Study on Tires With Reduced Roll Resistance

971159

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Increased Vehicle Energy Dissipation Due to Changes in Road Roughness with Emphasis on Rolling Losses

790653

View Details

X