1980-02-01

Restraint Systems Comparison in Frontal Crashes Using a Living Animal 800297

Since the three point belt appeared, many improvements were searched. With the aim of estimating their efficiency, a comparative study, choosing a living subject - the baboon - has been carried out. The static three-point belt being the reference, the restraint systems were tested in frontal impacts at 14 m/s (50 km/h) and more.
Besides classical biomechanical criteria, the lesion finding and the baboon stress led us to the conclusion that: 1 - the pre-inflated belt gives the most favourable results, 2 - the load-limited belt is not easy to be adjusted, 3 - the pre-loaded belt has an efficiency much dependent on the crash detection and 4 - the automatic retractor belt shows a “film spool” effect that may be unfavourable. Moreover, this study gave indications on the biomechanical criteria credibility.

SAE MOBILUS

Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content. Learn More »

Access SAE MOBILUS »

Members save up to 16% off list price.
Login to see discount.
Special Offer: Download multiple Technical Papers each year? TechSelect is a cost-effective subscription option to select and download 12-100 full-text Technical Papers per year. Find more information here.
We also recommend:
Book
BOOK

Stapp Car Crash Journal Vol. 62, 2018

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

Response and Tolerance of the Human Forearm to Impact Loading

983149

View Details

TECHNICAL PAPER

BioVolume : The Seat Integrated Human Based System to Meet FMVSS208 Automatic Suppression Concerns

2003-01-0515

View Details

X