Restraint Systems Comparison in Frontal Crashes Using a Living Animal 800297
Since the three point belt appeared, many improvements were searched. With the aim of estimating their efficiency, a comparative study, choosing a living subject - the baboon - has been carried out. The static three-point belt being the reference, the restraint systems were tested in frontal impacts at 14 m/s (50 km/h) and more.
Besides classical biomechanical criteria, the lesion finding and the baboon stress led us to the conclusion that: 1 - the pre-inflated belt gives the most favourable results, 2 - the load-limited belt is not easy to be adjusted, 3 - the pre-loaded belt has an efficiency much dependent on the crash detection and 4 - the automatic retractor belt shows a “film spool” effect that may be unfavourable. Moreover, this study gave indications on the biomechanical criteria credibility.
Citation: DeJeammes, M., Biard, R., Quincy, R., Derrien, Y. et al., "Restraint Systems Comparison in Frontal Crashes Using a Living Animal," SAE Technical Paper 800297, 1980, https://doi.org/10.4271/800297. Download Citation
Author(s):
M. DeJeammes, R. Biard, R. Quincy, Y. Derrien, P. Billault, C. Tisseron
Affiliated:
Laboratoire des Chocs et de Biomécanique–ONSER, Centre d'Etudes Techniques–CITROEN
Pages: 18
Event:
1980 Automotive Engineering Congress and Exposition
ISSN:
0148-7191
e-ISSN:
2688-3627
Related Topics:
Frontal collisions
Restraint systems
Biomechanics
Crashes
SAE MOBILUS
Subscribers can view annotate, and download all of SAE's content.
Learn More »